Posted: December 28th, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Stocks, Utility-Stocks, Widow-and-Orphan-Stocks
| No Comments »
In the past, the term “widows and orphans” was used to describe stocks with a relatively high degree of safety and dividend income. Because they had relatively minimal risk and provided income to feed the family, these kinds of stocks were literally thought to be the only investments suitable for widows and orphans. The term is noteworthy because it was generally used during market bottoms, but today it means something different.
A widow-and-orphan stock was the blue chip stock of its day: the stock of a large well-known firm that was thought to have an unassailable market leadership position and that paid a “good” dividend. This term was generally applied to utility stocks (electric, gas and telephones). Utilities are often referred to as widow-and-orphan stocks because of their monopoly (or, if you prefer, government-mandated market leadership) and dividend yield. Banks were excluded from this class as the result of their involvement in the bubble and crash of 1929. It was not until several years after the government-instituted regulations like the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated investment banking and “regular” commercial banking, that “widows and orphans” was again applied to commercial banks. Depending on the business cycle, the term was also applied to railroad and auto stocks.
Posted: December 27th, 2006 | Author: poster | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Stocks
| No Comments »
Investing has always been a little like surfing. Successful investors spot key investment themes (waves) and ride them to profits. Sometimes the waves are shorter and smaller than we had expected. Other times the wave takes on a mind of its own and falls under its own weight. The hardest but most profitable thing to do is to be the lone rider of a wave that others have abandoned for the “next best thing”, and then wait for them to catch up. The key is to know when to get on and when to get off. Previous examples of trend investing include defense stocks during the second World War, oil stocks in the ’70s, and of course, the dotcoms.
Posted: December 25th, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Benjamin-Graham, Warren-Buffett
| No Comments »
One of the tenets of Benjamin Graham, the father of value investing and Warren Buffett’s mentor, was “margin of safety”. Conditions may arise in the market place where the price of a security may be purchased at a price less than even a cautious estimate of it’s intrinsic value. The greater this disparity becomes then the greater the “margin of safety”.
The price to book ratio measures the latest price of the company’s shares relative to the current shareholder’s equity. If the price to book ratio is less than 1, this implies that one is getting more than $1 of assets for every $1 invested. All things being equal it is implied that a stock with a lower book ratio should have a greater “margin of safety”
Posted: December 23rd, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Aldelphia, Amazon, AOL, Enron, EPS, WorldCom
| No Comments »
Every company games the numbers to a certain extent to achieve budget and get bonuses. This is nothing new. But two things make the here and now different for us. First, our money is the issue (history is always about other people’s money). Second, these are BIG numbers.
Enron, Aldelphia and WorldCom are extreme examples. They are the few bad apples that get all the headlines. I believe that people with better ethics run the majority of companies. They may bend the rules, but few take the process to the extremes of Enron or WorldCom. If this weren’t true, we’d all be investing in government bonds
Posted: December 23rd, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Short-Selling, Stocks
| No Comments »
There is nothing inherently wrong with short selling, which is permissible under the regulations of the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). But the short-and-distort type of short seller uses misinformation and a bear market to manipulate stocks. Short and distort is as illegal as the pump and dump, but is mainly used in a bear market. It is important for investors to be aware of the dangers and to know how to protect themselves.
Posted: December 22nd, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Capitulation, Wall-Street
| No Comments »
There tends to be a lot of talk about “investor capitulation” when stocks continue to tank. But what is meant by capitulation in Wall Street terms and what does it mean for future stock trends? This article will discuss both.
Capitulation is defined in the American Heritage Dictionary as the following:
capitulation (n)
1. The act of surrendering or giving up. Surrender.
2. A document containing the terms of surrender.
Posted: December 21st, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Day-Trading, GDP, Stocks
| 2 Comments »
In the Stock Market, the bulls and bears are in a constant struggle. If you haven’t heard of these terms already, you undoubtedly will as you begin to invest.
The Bulls
A bull market is when everything in the economy is great, people are finding jobs, GDP is growing, and stocks are rising. Things are just plain rosy! Picking stocks during a bull market is easier because everything is going up. Bull markets cannot last forever though, and sometimes they can lead to dangerous situations if stocks become overvalued. If a person is optimistic, believing that stocks will go up, he or she is called a “bull” and said to have a “bullish outlook.”
Posted: December 19th, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Buyback, EPS, Stocks
| No Comments »
When times are tough in the market, companies will often announce stock buyback programs. Why would a company want to buy back its own shares? What does this mean for shareholders?
Buyback Basics
A stock buyback, also known as a “share repurchase”, is a company’s plan to buy back its own shares from the marketplace. You can think of a buyback as a company investing in itself, using its cash to buy shares. The idea is simple: since a company can’t own itself, the buyback reduces the number of outstanding shares on the market.
Buybacks can be carried out in two ways:
Posted: December 19th, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: Cyclical-Stocks, Growth-Stocks, Jim-Slater
| No Comments »
Think of being on a Ferris wheel: one minute you’re on top of the world, the next you’re at the bottom – and eager to head back up again. Investing in cyclical companies is much the same, except the the time it takes to go up and down, known as a business cycle, can last years.
Posted: December 18th, 2006 | Author: StockPK Team | Filed under: Articles | Tags: EPS, PEG-Ratio
| No Comments »
The PEG (price/earnings to growth) ratio is a tool that can help investors find undervalued stocks. It’s not as well known as its cousins, the P/E and P/B ratios, but it is just as valuable. When used in conjunction with other ratios, it gives investors a perspective of how the market views a stock’s growth potential in relation to EPS growth.
What the PEG Ratio Is:
The PEG ratio compares a stock’s price/earnings (“P/E”) ratio to its expected EPS growth rate. If the PEG ratio is equal to one, it means that the market is pricing the stock to fully reflect the stock’s EPS growth. This is “normal” in theory because, in a rational and efficient market, the P/E is supposed to reflect a stock’s future earnings growth.
Recent Comments